Tuesday, April 27, 2010

The Untalented

http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=111774375513496&ref=ts

So my favorite punk band in Western Canada deserves some words of praise, and I am going to be the one to give it to them. Straight out of Ile Des Chens Manitoba, this 4 piece will beat you over the head with some ear smashing, near anthmatic, tights as fuck, hardcore punk rock. We have had the pleasure of playing many shows with these cats, and every time its hilariously awesome. The energy these cats exude on stage is sublime, with fat as North Americans bass lines, and ripping guitar riffs, all set to the face smashing expertly timed drum track which remind of me of Minor Threat, if they did drugs and listened to metal. But it is just more than the music that makes the Untalented the real fucking deal. It's politics man. All the members of the band seem to have a grasp about just how insane and rapacious our culture is becoming, and are living examples of collectivist resistance. From their delicious vegan recipes, to their epic pot brownie parties, homegrown organic produce, midnight philosophy sessions, and a sickening ability to play almost every instrument imaginable, the Untalented craft a hard as fuck, relentless sound that is both classically punk, and progressive. I could go on and on but check out their page and see for yourself.

As for Releases??? The Winnipeg Band Co-Op will be Releasing a split 7 inch feat. both the Untalented and The Savants, marking the first official Untalented Release, and the vinyl debut for the Sav's.

Check the blog for an up and coming interview with the Untalented.

April. 30

http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=111774375513496&ref=ts

The following is a link to the show that the Savants are playing with the Infamous Ditch Pig. It is gonna get fucking crusty.

Thursday, April 1, 2010

What a Fucking Dougebag,

" If you use technology smart, you don't have to necessarily jump on the Hybrid band wagon" was the moronic bleating of some technocrat extolling the virtues of fossil fuels over alternative energy resources as it relates to transportation. This unnamed fan of fossils was suggesting we re-design our vehicles to run more efficiently using less gas, in effect lowering our demand for petroleum products but not eliminating our dependency on them. Why? Why would we want to move to cleaner energy resources? The high prices? The billions we spend on foreign wars? The malicious murders and state terror that goes along with securing and protecting these interests? I mean why eliminate the need for oil when we can just keep on killing right? I should probably stop listening to the radio. Anyway, this technology will increase the cost of automobiles although we are supposed to recoup our loses after a year and a half with improved milage. Same old alternitives safe in the realm of permissable argument. So for those of you who agree with the title of this post, check out the Venus Project.

http://www.thevenusproject.com

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

April.

The SAVANTS are playing a tribute show to Operation Ivy w. The Untalented. The Ivy Operation, featuring members of Kids On Fire, Sub City, No More Heros, and the Vibrating beds. So it's a fucking super group, make sure you get there.

Unfortunatly, Kliens 96 was supposed to come down but the Albert bumped the show. Sucks but we will be bringing them down in May or June, so hang on to your hats.

Here is a link to the facebook event

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/event.php?eid=363896682898#wall_posts

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Harvest King Records

HKR, a label based out of Regina is kicking ass and taking names all over Canada. This label is putting out some of the best punk rock in the entire country. We had the good fortune of being able to play with Kliens96 on our last tour, and it was one of the best shows I have ever seen. Just proof positive that there is something out there worth exploring. If you are anything like me, you are tired of throwback bands emulating shitty 50's pop. That means rockabilly, garage rock, and all that lame shit that WAS cool, but should have died in the mid 60's, then this is for you.

and now some back story...

Canada seems to be in this musical slump; drowning in a sea of garage/rock-a-indy music that keeps puking up the same old shit. Bands of this ilk will put out a record or two, while fans lament; "The first record was better", but still will buy every stupid fucking track that these morons birth into creation. It is a shame really, to see us flounder around in a mass of folk rock, that has me up at night asking the question; "Why"? and, "how much more of this shit can I endure". And then October, 2009, a miracle. My girlfriend and I caught the Propagandhi/Rebel Spell, show at the U of R. Opening for those two were 2/3's of Kliens 96. They played a stripped down, drum and bass hardcore that was both explosive and crisp. Everything about them was fantastic, most notably, there cover of and I-SPY song, which was more of an homage to Prop's bass player Todd Kowalski (from Regina). Fast forward a few months and I had the pleasure of catching DFA play with Municipal Waste. I quickly snatched up DFA'S album after being knocked flat by the sheer intensity they exude. Now flash forward Feb.11/2010, and here I am playing with Kliens96, who were kind enough to give me a copy of there split 7" with Rehash, a band containing members of DFA.

What we have here, is some of the best thrash punk I have ever heard. These bands transcend the typical hardcore associated with places like Boston, New York, or the East Bay. These American bands who glorify violence in the name of friendship, or stupid street morals, reflecting repugnant, distinctly American vales. Which, I believe, is more of a reflection of the insanity of the culture which these bands are a part of. Canadian hardcore is destroying the yankees, making them look like children who fumble about with their instruments. All this is coming out of Saskatchewan, can you fucking believe it?! I will tell you it is refreshing to see bands play with heart and passion, and conviction, rather than the dull prairie skinhead, greaser, garage bullshit that has been swallowing this country whole. Not to mention toppling the violent American hardcore, with acute, well thought out political sensibilities. So enough gushing...

http://www.harvestkingrecords.com
www.myspace.com/harvestkingrecords

check out there website for more info.

Monday, March 1, 2010

Winnipeg Musicians Co-Op

As the title of this post suggests, we here in Savant land have decided to unite our fellow fuck-ups in a consorted effort to push 'real' punk rock across this country in the least coercive way imaginable. So here we are, the Winnipeg Musicians/Band Co-Op. An egalitarian "record label" (and i use the term loosely)designed to promote and distribute music and the most grass roots level. Now you may be asking yourself how this all works, so here it is.

Musicians who wish to join the program do not surrender the rights of their music to anyone. Rather, bands are put in touch with other bands and collaborate on a series of splits and compilations. Costs and responsibilities for each program are determined by the level of involvement that the musicians choose to engage in. Costs are shared between the collaborating parties, and the music is distributed by everyone involved in said project. Once an agreement is made between the parties, the music will go to pressing and copies distributed evenly. At this point, the physical product may be distributed any way the musicians see fit. Once the pressing is complete a digital copy of the split must be submitted to the WMC chairpersons, who will add the project to our online community. Any monies made through online sales will be split evenly between the collaborative members of the project.

In this way, no band is being used for private capital gain. All members involved in the WMC have there music readily available for the wider community, while the bands involved in individual projects, have the opportunity to reach a larger audience, through the combined efforts of each band. These efforts include touring, further distribution by smaller labels involved in the project, selling records at show etc. Bands involved in the WMC may also submit their full lengths if they so choose, but are under no pressure to do so. Bands also have the opportunity to buy product internally from one another, AT COST, so that they may help promote other WMC members.

Bands involved in the WMC that are not from Winnipeg can also enjoy the benefits of have an organization that will both promote and set up shows for you here. The WMC will provide you with a place to play, food to eat, and a place to stay. Non-Winnipeg based members are encouraged to set up there own chapters to help support the collective effort.

The chair people of the WMC will facilitate all projects and pressings. Essentially,
once your project is complete, all you need to do is submit your product and financial contribution to the WMC and we will take care of the rest, at NO CHARGE. In some cases the WMC will also contribute financially to the project to help keep costs down. As the chair-people we will only take an amount of product equal to the cost of our contribution,so we will never take more than we need. Any copies the WMC does take will be put into distribution through any of the bands based in Winnipeg, focusing primarily on the touring bands affiliated with us.

anyone interested in further information, or joining our little co-op can reach us here at thesavants@gmail.com

Together, we can make punk rock a living breathing thing again. We can make it a true community again, and put the love back into it.

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Providing some context for Haiti

The following is a reproduction of an article written by Journalist David Swanson. Hopefully this provides some context and background for the crisis in Haiti. It's not just about bad weather....the actual article can be found at http://davidswanson.org/node/2415

What Bush Did to Haiti

By davidswanson - Posted on 18 January 2010

By David Swanson

If a group of dedicated scholars, attorneys, journalists, and activists had tried to generate a comprehensive list of impeachable offenses committed by George W. Bush as president, and only 35 of them had been introduced into Congress, one of the many discarded ones, in rough and overly detailed form, might have read something like this:

In his conduct while President of the United States, George W. Bush, in violation of his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty under Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution "to take care that the laws be faithfully executed", has both personally and acting through his agents and subordinates, caused the United States of America to kidnap, imprison, intimidate, coerce, threaten, confine, abduct, and carry away the elected, constitutional President of Haiti, and his wife, a U.S citizen, in violation of United States statutes, to wit:

a. The President, both personally and acting through his agents and subordinates, prevented the security contractors working for Haiti's elected, constitutional government led by President Jean-Bertrand Aristide from receiving reinforcements at a time when Haiti's constitutional government was under attack. The removal of the security contractors facilitated the kidnapping of President Aristide:

b. On February 17, 2004, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell defended President Aristide as the "free and fairly elected President of Haiti." Referring to insurgents who brutally attacked police stations and other government building over the previous weeks, Secretary Powell further stated that the United States "cannot buy into a proposition that says the elected President must be forced out of office by thugs and those who do not respect law and are bringing terrible violence to the Haitian people."

c. On the afternoon of Saturday, February 28, 2004, the Steele Foundation, a U.S. company that had been providing private security services to the Haitian government, informed President Aristide that the U.S. government had asked it to withdraw all of its personnel from Haiti. The Steele Foundation also told President Aristide that the U.S. government was blocking the Steele Foundation's efforts to bring to Haiti additional personnel needed to protect the President. Later that day, the Steele Foundation informed President Aristide that without the additional personnel, the Foundation would not be able to protect the President or his wife.

d. The President, both personally and acting through his agents and subordinates, misrepresented the immediacy of the threat against President Aristide, and informed him that U.S. forces in the country would not help either the President or his constitutional government:

e. On February 28, members of the U.S. Foreign Service informed President Aristide that rebel forces under the command of Guy Philippe, a U.S.-trained former army and police officer, were less than 50 miles outside Haiti's capital, Port-au-Prince. The diplomats informed President Aristide that Mr. Philippe's forces would attack the next day. At the time, Mr. Philippe and his soldiers were in Cap-Haitian, at the far northern end of Haiti, and could not have reached Port-au-Prince for several days.

f. Members of the U.S. Foreign service told President Aristide that if he remained in Port-au-Prince, the United States would not provide any assistance when the expected attack by the insurgents occurred, and that they expected that the insurgents would kill him, his wife and many of his supporters.

g. That night, the U.S. Deputy Charge de Mission (DCM) in Haiti, Luis Moreno, accompanied by a contingent of U.S. troops, met with President Aristide. Moreno reiterated the expectation that an attack by the insurgents was imminent and the promise that the U.S. would not intervene to protect President Aristide or his supporters. He then informed President Aristide that if he left at that moment, the United States would provide aircraft for him to leave, but only if he provided the United States with a letter of resignation.

h. On February 28, Secretary Powell called former Representative Ron Dellums, who had been engaged as a lobbyist in Washington by the Haitian government. Secretary Powell informed Mr. Dellums that the insurgents were going to attack Port-au-Prince the next day (February 29), and that the United States would do nothing to interfere with their plans.

i. The President, acting through his agents and subordinates, forced President Aristide onto an unmarked U.S. plane that filed a false flight plan, and flew him against his will to the Central African Republic.

j. On February 25, Secretary Powell issued a threat to President Aristide, telling the press: "whether or not Aristide is able to effectively continue as President is something he will have to examine carefully in the interests of the Haitian people." On February 28, a senior State Department official told CNN that the "international community" is "putting pressure on Aristide to live up to his responsibilities and to think hard about his future," which implied more pressure for President Aristide to step down. The CNN article also reported that "privately the United States continues to distance itself from Aristide and suggests it might be time for him to step down." Timothy Carney, who was appointed by President Bush to run Iraq's Ministry of Minerals and Mines in 2003 and coordinator of Iraq reconstruction in January 2007, announced to the press that "Aristide is toast. He's gone. The only question is whether he goes out in a pine box or on an airplane." These statements contradicted the earlier statements of the Secretary of State, which recognized Aristide as the democratically elected President of Haiti and blamed the rebel groups for the violence gripping the country.

k. On February 28, White House spokesman Scott McClellan stated, "Aristide's own actions have called into question his fitness to govern Haiti. We urge him to examine his position carefully…."

l. President Aristide, at all times, publicly and privately, insisted that he would remain in office to serve out his constitutional term.

m. On February 28, President Aristide conferred with U.S. Ambassador to Haiti James Foley and DCM Luis Moreno about ways of avoiding further violence in Port-au-Prince. Early in the morning of February 29, at Mr. Moreno's request, President Aristide agreed to go with a U.S. escort to a location where he could appear on television to appeal for calm. The escort that arrived at President Aristide's house consisted of heavily armed, uniformed members of the U.S. Armed Forces traveling in a convoy. The escorts took President Aristide and his wife from his house, and instead of taking him to a television studio, took him to the Port-au-Prince airport.

n. The Steele Foundation security contractors protecting President Aristide were told to plan for a move to the U.S. Embassy where President Aristide would make a TV broadcast. Then minutes before they left President Aristide's residence, they were told they were going to the airport and that they would be leaving with him on the plane.

o. An unmarked white aircraft, with a U.S. flag, had been flown in by the U.S. government, and sat on the airport runway According to a customs declaration at a refueling stop, the aircraft was owned or operated by Technilink, and was registered in the U.S.A, registration number N145CA. Haiti's national airport was secured by U.S. soldiers. President Aristide reported that DCM Moreno forced him to sign a letter and board the plane.

p. President Aristide claims that the statement that he signed was not a resignation letter, that he did not intend to resign – that it included a conditional statement, "[i]f I am obliged to leave in order to avoid bloodshed . . . ." The United States Government reported this letter as a resignation, to the United States public, to the United Nations and to the Organization of American States even though the Creole expert the government asked to translate it, Professor Bryant Freeman of the University of Kansas, concluded that the statement was not a resignation letter.

q. Uniformed and heavily-armed members of the U.S. armed forces boarded the plane along with President Aristide. They changed into civilian clothes after boarding. Nineteen members of the Steele Foundation security detail also boarded the plane, although they were taking direction not from President Aristide, but from officials of the United States. Also on board were President Aristide's wife, Mildred Trouillot Aristide, a U.S. citizen, and two Haitian security officials.

r. The plane left Port-au-Prince at about 6 AM on February 29. Once placed on the aircraft, President Aristide and his wife were kept incommunicado by United States military personnel, even though the plane was equipped with faxes, satellite telephones, and other means of communication. The passengers were forced to keep the shutters on the aircraft closed at all times. They were denied the right to leave the aircraft when it landed in Antigua and thereafter when it refueled.

s. The operators of the aircraft provided the Antiguan government a fraudulent customs declaration that stated there were no passengers on board, that the flight had originated in "Guantanamo Bay," and that there had been no intermediate stops. No destination was listed.

t. Neither the President nor his wife, who is a United States citizen, was told by the United States military personnel where the aircraft was going or when they would land. They were kept as prisoners on the aircraft and were only told a short time before the aircraft landed that the Central African Republic was their country of destination.

u. When the unmarked plane landed at the airport in Bangui, Central Africa Republic, it was met by French soldiers, who were based in the Republic. Officials of the Central African Republic informed President Aristide's lawyer that they were in consultation with both French and United States officials about keeping President Aristide in the country, and that they were doing it as a "favor" for those countries.

v. President Aristide was kept against his will in the Central African Republic. He was not allowed to leave his lodging on the grounds of the Presidential Palace without government permission and an escort, and he was not allowed to speak on the telephone after he made a few calls explaining what had happened to him, which Central African Republic officials called "regrettable statements. President Aristide was kept there for two weeks, until a mission led by U.S. Representative Maxine Waters flew to the country and negotiated his release with the President of the Central African Republic, Francis Bozize.

w. President Bush's kidnapping of President Aristide and his wife violated U.S. law:

x. Under 18 U.S.C. section 112, it is a criminal offense to imprison, intimidate, coerce, or threaten an "Internationally Protected Person." The statute's definition of "Internationally Protected Person" includes both President Aristide and his wife, Mildred Trouillot Aristide. The actions by President Bush and his agents and subordinates, including Secretary Powell, Ambassador Foley and DCM Moreno, included imprisonment, intimidation, coercion and threats within the statute. The statute penalizes such illegal conduct with prison sentences up to ten years. The statute confers jurisdiction for these crimes to U.S. courts, because the offenders were nationals of the United States, and were afterward found within the United States.

y. Under 18 U.S.C. section 1201, it is a criminal offense to unlawfully confine, kidnap, abduct, or carry away an "Internationally Protected Person." The statute's definition of "Internationally Protected Person" includes both President Aristide and his wife, Mildred Trouillot Aristide. The actions by President Bush and his agents and subordinates, including Secretary Powell, Ambassador Foley and DCM Moreno, included seizing, confining, kidnapping, abducting, and carrying away of both President Aristide and his wife. The statute penalizes such illegal conduct with prison sentences of up to life in prison. The statute confers jurisdiction for these crimes to U.S. courts, because the offenders were nationals of the United States, and were afterward found within the United States.

In all of these actions and decisions, President George W. Bush has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and Commander in Chief, and subversive of constitutional government, to the prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States. Wherefore, President George W. Bush, by such conduct, is guilty of an impeachable offense warranting removal from office.